Video of a commentary on relations between the United States and Russia broadcast on state television in Moscow on Sunday night.
As the United States condemned a referendum on the future of the Crimean peninsula staged by pro-Russian separatists on Sunday, one of Russiaâs most influential television hosts appeared on the evening news in Moscow, before a huge mushroom cloud graphic, to remind viewers that Russia is still âthe only country in the world capable of turning the U.S.A. into radioactive dust.â
Although the saber-rattling comments came from Dmitry Kiselyov, a news anchor well-known for his âmad as hellâ delivery of diatribes on the supposed threats to Russia posed by foreign plotters and native homosexuals, the report still stunned viewers of the state broadcasterâs main channel.
One reason is that, as the Russian journalist Leonid Ragozin observed, Mr. Kiselyov was the man recently chosen by President Vladimir Putin to lead an official news agency charged with explaining Kremlin policy to the world, a media organization to be called Rossiya Sevodnya, or Russia Today.
Mr. Ragozin noted that the anchor also claimed that President Obama was deeply worried by Russiaâs nuclear arsenal.
The Associated Press Moscow correspondent Laura Mills reported that the broadcaster then moved on to attack a âfifth columnâ of supposedly traitorous Russian dissidents who had signed an open letter against the Kremlinâs âde facto annexation of Crimea.â
Mr. Kiselyovâs appointment, and the shuttering of a more independent state news agency, was described by Russiaâs respected business daily Vedomosti as a sign that Mr. Putin had abandoned any hope of convincing educated Russians to embrace his policies, my colleague Serge Schmemann explained. âThe Kremlin acknowledged that it has lost the educated community,â the editors of Vedomosti wrote in December, âand has neither the means nor the will to hold a dialogue about values, and therefore instead of culture began to impose ideology, and instead of information, propaganda.â
Virulently anti-gay comments from the Russian television host and executive Dmitry Kiselyov, subtitled by Russian activists.
The instant online reaction to Mr. Kiselyovâs Sunday night riff from Russian bloggers seemed to indicate that they are indeed not the target demographic for his editorial commentaries.
A screenshot of the segment, with a caption suggesting that the host might have a substance abuse problem, was posted on the Twitter feed of Aleksei Navalny, an opposition leader currently under house arrest whose blog was blocked by Russian Internet authorities last week.
Mr. Navalnyâs feed, which is ostensibly under the control of his wife until the end of his ban from using the Internet, also drew attention to another opposition activistâs suggestion of how the segment should have ended, with the host being dragged away by men in white coats.
Other bloggers heaped scorn on Mr. Kiselyovâs false claim that President Obamaâs hair had turned grey from worry over Russiaâs nuclear might.
As my colleague Ellen Barry reported on Saturday, some influential members of the Russian presidentâs inner circle âview isolation from the West as a good thing for Russia,â and seem to welcome the revival of Cold War tensions. On Sunday, she noted, the director of the Carnegie Moscow Center, Dmitri Trenin, told RT, a Kremlin-funded news network that broadcasts in English, that the new standoff between Moscow and the West âcloses the books on what I would call inter Cold War periodâ that began with the fall of the Berlin Wall.
An English-language interview with Dmitri Trenin, the director of the Carnegie Moscow Center, on the Kremlin-funded channel RT.
Russian bloggers also turned their attention to reworking an A.P. photograph of a confrontation on Saturday between the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, and her Russian counterpart, Vitaly Churkin.
John Minchillo/Associated PressFollow Robert Mackey on Twitter @robertmackey.