DXPG

Total Pageviews

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Greek Soccer Player Banned for Nazi Salute

Giorgos Katidis, a midfielder for AEK Athens, celebrated a goal on Saturday with a Nazi salute.INTIME, via Associated Press Giorgos Katidis, a midfielder for AEK Athens, celebrated a goal on Saturday with a Nazi salute.

Giorgos Katidis, a 20-year-old Greek soccer player who celebrated a game-winning goal on Saturday by giving a Nazi salute to fans in Athens, has been banned for life from representing his country in international tournaments.

The Hellenic Football Federation met Sunday in response to the incident the night before and decided to ban the player who has previously captained the national team in youth competitions. “The player’s action to salute to spectatos in a Nazi manner is a severe provocation, insults all the victims of Nazi barbarity and injures the deeply pacifist and human character of the game,” the federation said as Greece marked the 70th anniversary of the deportation of thousands of Greek Jews to Nazi death camps.

Katidis, who initially claimed that he was not saluting but pointing at a friend in the stands, said later that he had no idea what the gesture meant. In an apology issued after the ban, he called his salute, “totally unacceptable,” adding, “I feel terrible for those I upset with the stupidity of my act.”

Video of Greek soccer player Giorgos Katidis celebrating a goal with a Nazi salute to fans at the Olympic Stadium in Athens on Saturday.

The player also said on Sunday: “I want to clarify that I am not a fascist or neo-Nazi or racist. I have a step-brother from Puerto Rico and all my family are from the Black Sea and have experienced racism in the worst ways.” He added: “I sincerely apologize to my teammates and everyone involved with the club that I have insulted in not knowing exactly what I had done in my celebration. Nonetheless, the fact that I did not know what I was doing is no excuse.”

Video and photographs of the incident showed that while several members of the club’s support staff celebrated with the player, others looked disturbed by the gesture and at least one older man attempted to pull his arm down.

Giorgos Katidis, a Greek soccer player, extending a fascist salute to fans in Athens on Saturday.Icon/Reuters Giorgos Katidis, a Greek soccer player, extending a fascist salute to fans in Athens on Saturday.

In messages posted on Twitter late Saturday, the midfielder for A.E.K. Athens insisted that he was “not racist,” and claimed that he was entirely ignorant of the meaning of the salute. “I despise fascism,” he wrote. “I would not have done it if I knew what something like this meant. I know what the consequences are and I would never have done it.”

Ewald Lienen, the German coach of A.E.K. Athens â€" known for his left-wing politics during his playing days â€" endorsed the player’s claim of ignorance. “He hasn’t got a clue about politics,” the coach said. “That’s why we shouldn’t condemn him. Any footballer who knows about my past, were I’m from and my political beliefs would know that such a gesture would lead to that being his last game for A.E.K.” the Greek newspaper Kathimerini reported. “He most likely saw such a salute on the Internet or somewhere else and did it without knowing what it means.”

The incident comes just two months after a German-Ghanaian star of the Italian club A.C. Milan, Kevin-Prince Boateng, walked off the pitch during an exhibition match to protest racist chants.

The emerging Greek star’s gesture was also made in the wake of recent gains by a neo-Nazi party in Greek politics. As the Athens daily Kathimerini notes, “Golden Dawn, the far-right party that entered Parliament last summer has defended the Nazi salute, which has been performed in public by some its M.P.s, including leader Nikos Michaloliakos, by claiming that it is an ancient Greek greeting.”

European soccer authorities have been forced to confront expressions of sympathy with fascist movements from players and fans more than once in recent years. In 2005, the Italian star Paolo Di Canio was banned for one game when he greeted die-hard fans of his club Lazio with the so-called Roman salute, which he said was merely part of the region’s cultural heritage. “I am a fascist, not a racist,” he said then. “I made the Roma salute because it’s a salute from a comrade to his comrades and was meant for my people. With this stiff arm I do no want to incite violence or racial hatred.”

A few years earlier, extremists among the Lazio fan base, known as “ultras,” held aloft banners celebrating the Nazi death camps at Auschiwitz and praising the Serbian warlord Arkan, who led bands of armed soccer hooligans from Belgrade into Croatia and Bosnia on rampages of ethnic cleansing in the 1990s.

The unapologetic Di Canio managed to survive the controversy generated by his gesture to continue his playing careerand move into management. He has recently been mentioned as a possible manager at the top level in English soccer.



Disruptions: Stuck With a Carrier for the Long Haul

If dating were like the cellphone industry, you would have to sign a contract when you entered a relationship stating that you would remain monogamous for two years, even if you wanted to break up. That’s what cellular carriers have pulled off by successfully lobbying for a recent government ruling that you cannot take the phone you paid for and switch to another provider.

It’s the latest reminder that owning a cellphone on one of the biggest United States providers can sometimes feel like a relationship you can’t get out of. Time and again, in the minds of many customers, these companies take advantage of us and there isn’t much we can do about it.

Srinivasan Keshav, a professor at the University of Waterloo, in Ontario, who studies mobile computing, has found that cell carriers make more than a 4,000 percent profit on text messags. Sending a megabyte of text messages over the cell network costs customers roughly $1,500. What does it cost carriers Close to nothing, as texts piggyback on other data transfers, including voice calls. The carriers combined make billions of dollars a year in fees on texting alone.

Then there was AT&T’s decision in mid-2010 to kill unlimited data plans on smartphones for new customers. As Felix Salmon of Reuters wrote at the time, “AT&T prefers to make life harder for its customers, if that’s going to give it a little bit more money.” For those who kept their unlimited plans and use larger amounts of data, like me, AT&T sometimes slows the data connection on its network.

As my colleague David Pogue wrote in 2009, carriers force people to listen to a 15-second message with instructions on how to leave a voice mail message before they can actually leave one, and charge them for that time.

CTIA, the wireless industry trade group, defended the latest move by wireless companies, saying that prohibiting people from taking their phones with them, a practice known as unlocking, would help protect carriers’ investments in subsidizing new handsets, and ultimately benefit customers.

“What we’re trying to do is good for customers â€" it is just not immediately apparent to them yet,” said Jot Carpenter, CTIA’s vice president for government affairs. He said cell carriers were trying to solve two issues: stopping people from selling stolen unlocked cellphones and helping keep down the cost of handsets by ensuring that phones that have been subsidized by carriers return their investment.

But members of ongress, the Obama administration and the Federal Communications Commission see it differently. Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Senator Charles Grassley, Republican of Iowa, introduced a bill this month to overturn the ban on letting customers unlock their phones. The White House has said it is “common sense” for people to be allowed to do so. Julius Genachowski, the F.C.C.’s chairman, said the ban “doesn’t pass the common-sense test.”

Harold Feld, senior vice president at Public Knowledge, a nonprofit company that focuses on information policy, likens the phone companies to airlines, which have reduced the cost of flights but now charge passengers to check bags, board early or eat a meal. “The difference, though, is that with airlines, once you are finished with that flight, you can choose to never fly with them again,” he said.

Mr. Carpenter o! f CTIA sa! id that if customers were unhappy, they could easily switch providers. “There’s a tremendous amount of choice and competition in the industry,” he said.



Disruptions: Stuck With a Carrier for the Long Haul

If dating were like the cellphone industry, you would have to sign a contract when you entered a relationship stating that you would remain monogamous for two years, even if you wanted to break up. That’s what cellular carriers have pulled off by successfully lobbying for a recent government ruling that you cannot take the phone you paid for and switch to another provider.

It’s the latest reminder that owning a cellphone on one of the biggest United States providers can sometimes feel like a relationship you can’t get out of. Time and again, in the minds of many customers, these companies take advantage of us and there isn’t much we can do about it.

Srinivasan Keshav, a professor at the University of Waterloo, in Ontario, who studies mobile computing, has found that cell carriers make more than a 4,000 percent profit on text messags. Sending a megabyte of text messages over the cell network costs customers roughly $1,500. What does it cost carriers Close to nothing, as texts piggyback on other data transfers, including voice calls. The carriers combined make billions of dollars a year in fees on texting alone.

Then there was AT&T’s decision in mid-2010 to kill unlimited data plans on smartphones for new customers. As Felix Salmon of Reuters wrote at the time, “AT&T prefers to make life harder for its customers, if that’s going to give it a little bit more money.” For those who kept their unlimited plans and use larger amounts of data, like me, AT&T sometimes slows the data connection on its network.

As my colleague David Pogue wrote in 2009, carriers force people to listen to a 15-second message with instructions on how to leave a voice mail message before they can actually leave one, and charge them for that time.

CTIA, the wireless industry trade group, defended the latest move by wireless companies, saying that prohibiting people from taking their phones with them, a practice known as unlocking, would help protect carriers’ investments in subsidizing new handsets, and ultimately benefit customers.

“What we’re trying to do is good for customers â€" it is just not immediately apparent to them yet,” said Jot Carpenter, CTIA’s vice president for government affairs. He said cell carriers were trying to solve two issues: stopping people from selling stolen unlocked cellphones and helping keep down the cost of handsets by ensuring that phones that have been subsidized by carriers return their investment.

But members of ongress, the Obama administration and the Federal Communications Commission see it differently. Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Senator Charles Grassley, Republican of Iowa, introduced a bill this month to overturn the ban on letting customers unlock their phones. The White House has said it is “common sense” for people to be allowed to do so. Julius Genachowski, the F.C.C.’s chairman, said the ban “doesn’t pass the common-sense test.”

Harold Feld, senior vice president at Public Knowledge, a nonprofit company that focuses on information policy, likens the phone companies to airlines, which have reduced the cost of flights but now charge passengers to check bags, board early or eat a meal. “The difference, though, is that with airlines, once you are finished with that flight, you can choose to never fly with them again,” he said.

Mr. Carpenter o! f CTIA sa! id that if customers were unhappy, they could easily switch providers. “There’s a tremendous amount of choice and competition in the industry,” he said.