Company’s App Can Now Be Used to Hail Yellow Cabs in City
After a series of court hearings and false starts, New York City’s yellow-taxi riders can now, for the first time, legally hail a cab with a smartphone app.
On Tuesday night, a company called Uber, which entered the yellow taxi-hailing market last year before being rebuffed by the city, said that its service was available, one week after a lawsuit challenging the use of such apps was dismissed. The city announced on Friday that Uber’s was so far the first and only app to be approved.
“The launch of Uber’s service is great news for New Yorkers and visitors to our city who want to quickly and conveniently get a taxi,†Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg said in a statement. “Adding safe and regulated e-hail service is the latest in our administration’s efforts to use innovative technology to improve taxi service.â€
In December, the city’s Taxi and Limousine Commission approved a pilot program of apps for yellow cabs, prompting a lawsuit from livery and black-car operators who argued that the program would violate the city’s longstanding ban on prearranged rides in yellow taxis. The plaintiffs initially succeeded in delaying the program, securing a temporary restraining order on the plan, but a State Supreme Court justice dismissed the suit last week.
Now a rival company, Hailo, appears to have drawn the city’s ire. The commission issued a terse industry notice this week warning drivers that they would be subject to summonses if they used a recently released test version of Hailo’s product.
A version of this article appeared in print on May 1, 2013, on page A23 of the New York edition with the headline: Company’s App Can Now Be Used to Hail Cabs in City.
A video report from Arutz Sheva, an Israeli settler news organization, on the funeral of Evyatar Borovsky, who was killed Tuesday near his home in the West Bank by a Palestinian attacker.
As my colleagues Isabel Kershner and Fares Akram report, the tension of daily life in the occupied West Bank exploded into deadly violence on Tuesday, when a knife-wielding Palestinian man attacked and killed an Israeli settler at a bus stop. The attacker, identified as Salam Zaghal, a 24-year-old who recently spent three years in jail for throwing stones, then seized the dead man’s pistol and engaged in a shoot-out with police officers.
On social networks and in statements to the news media, representatives Israel’s military and the leadership of the settler community were in no doubt about the nature of the attack, describing the killing as the murder of an Israeli civilian by a Palestinian terrorist.
This morning: #Palestinian #terrorist murdered Evyatar Borovsky, an #Israeli father of five http://t.co/L1IeVznUtZ
Some supporters of the national-religious settlement project, like the editors of The Jewish Press in Brooklyn, even blamed the officers who responded to the attack for not just killing the attacker on the spot. “It is not clear,†The Press reported, “why they shot the terrorist in the leg, and not the head.â€
From Palestinians and Israelis who oppose the occupation, though, condemnations of the killing were mixed with calls to pay attention to the broader context â€" in which an Arab community of 2.5 million, living under military rule for 46 years, is forced to accommodate itself to an influx of hundreds of thousands of Israeli migrants to expanding Jewish-only settlements, defended by armed soldiers, officers and civilian guards.
In a statement offering “condolences to the family of the murder victim,†the Israeli group Rabbis for Human Rights said it was “horrified by the nationalistic murder,†but also suggested that Palestinians are engaged in “a morally justified campaign against a discriminatory military regime.†The rabbis quickly added, however, that even a just cause “does not justify harm to civilians, and we harshly condemn any attack such as this.â€
Condolences to the family of the murder victim today at Tapuah Junction | Rabbis for Human Rights http://t.co/qOzaA2JpFz
According to Yousef Munayyer, the director of The Palestine Center in Washington, his group has documented more than 1,200 incidents of violence by settlers in the 18 months since the last killing of an Israeli civilian in the occupied territory.
#Israel settler killed by a Palestinian today in the WB for first time since Sept ’11 during which 1200+ settler violence incidents occurred
In a post for the Israeli news blog +972, Mairav Zonszein, argued that the 18 months since the last fatal attack on an Israeli in the West Bank had created “an illusion of calm and stability†in a status quo that is unsustainable. Ms. Zonszein, an Israeli-American blogger who works with Ta’ayush, an Arab-Jewish group that supports rural Palestinian communities in the South Hebron Hills, wrote:
During this “calm†period, most Israelis continue going about their lives. They aren’t affected by the violence of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on a daily basis. But days like today, when the phrase “terror attack†is back in the news, Israelis suddenly remember that we are in a violent conflict. The government, of course, does a good job of reminding us we are the victims.
But on all those days when there is no violence against Israelis in the news, on all those days when Israelis can go about their business, the situation is actually not at all stable or calm. It’s definitely not calm for the Palestinian population, specifically in the West Bank where life under occupation is anything but free of violence.
By way of explanation, Ms. Zonszein cited remarks published last year by the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek, on the constant pressure of life in the West Bank, between outbreaks of deadly violence, in which he asked the rhetorical question: “What goes on in the Middle East when nothing goes on there at the direct politico-military level (i.e. when there are no tensions, attacks, negotiations)?†His answer was:
What goes on is the incessant slow work of taking the land from the Palestinians in the West Bank: the gradual strangling of the Palestinian economy, the parceling of their land, the building of new settlements, the pressure on Palestinian farmers to make them abandon their land (which goes from crop-burning and religious desecration up to individual killings), all this supported by a Kafkaesque network of legal regulations.
“To avoid any kind of misunderstanding,†Mr. Žižek added, “taking all this into account in no way implies any ‘understanding’ for inexcusable terrorist acts. On the contrary, it provides the only ground from which one can condemn the terrorist attacks without hypocrisy.â€
In the days before the deadly attack, Ms. Zonszein’s fellow-activists at Ta’ayush were working to draw attention to how very tense daily life in the occupied West Bank can be when Israeli soldiers try to keep Palestinian farmers away from land near Israeli settlements.
Over the weekend, Ta’ayush released a brief video clip showing an Israeli soldier shouting with rage at Israeli activists who had accompanied Palestinian shepherds from a West Bank village as they tried to graze their sheep on land near Othni’el, an Israeli settlement.
Video recorded by an Israeli activist in the West Bank this month showed an Israeli soldier screaming at Palestinian shepherds and their Israeli supporters.
According to Ms. Zonszein’s translation, when a Ta’ayush activist named Guy interrupted the soldier as he was shouting at a shepherd, the reservist turned to Guy’s camera and screamed “Get out of here you Israel haters!†After threatening to hit the activist, he added: “You are worse than the Arabs!†The officer then shouted at a female Israeli activist: “Shut up, Israel hater who goes to bed with Arabs!â€
After the video was featured on the Web site of Israel’s most popular newspaper, Yedioth Ahronoth, the Israeli military called the officer’s conduct unbecoming, but suggested that the confrontation had been provoked by the “left-wing activists†who recorded it.
Activists from Ta’ayush have also documented an apparent effort by Israeli officers in the West Bank to prevent footage of what ordinary aspects of the occupation look like from being recorded. In another video clip, released with a blog post on Saturday, soldiers can be seen repeatedly blocking the lens of Ta’ayush activists as they attempted to film the shepherds being forced away from land near the settlement.
Video of Israeli officers using their own phones and cameras to block the lenses of Israeli activists attempting to record their work in the West Bank.
Asked about this footage, in which officers can be seen using their own phones and cameras to block the lenses of the activists, a spokesman for the Israel Defense Forces, Capt. Eytan Buchman, told The Lede: “a Palestinian shepherd, accompanied by Israeli activists, tried to illegally graze a field adjacent to the town of Othni’el in a blatant attempt to create a provocation. Security forces arrived in order to distance the shepherd and activists without the use of force.â€
Guy, Ta’ayushIsraeli soldiers blocked the cameras of Israeli activists who were recording their activities in the occupied West Bank this month.
Amiel Vardi, a Hebrew University classics professor and one of the founders of Ta’ayush, was with the shepherds in South Mount Hebron when the video was recorded. He told The Lede in an e-mail, “the soldiers gave no reason,†for blocking their cameras. “On the contrary, they insisted that they do not restrict our filming â€" only filming us too, as is their right. So much for what they said. As for what they actually did, I suppose they know that they have no legal authority to drive the shepherds away from these lands, and are not to keen to be filmed doing it.â€
As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported, Mr. Vardi “was shot in 2006 by a settler when he and friends tried to help Palestinian farmers reach their vineyards during the grape harvest.â€
According to the Ta’ayush activists, the effort to prevent them from recording scenes of routine confrontations in the occupied West Bank is a concerted one. Last month, they posted a video compilation of officers blocking their cameras during several visits to the area, and at the start of this month, they were even detained for several hours by police officers investigating a complaint filed by settlers who accused the activists of “disturbing public order†by filming construction at a settlement.
When it comes to comments on the Internet, there are often two distinct buckets. One, a sludge of vitriol and anger toward the author of a post or story. The second, too many comments to navigate where the good input from readers is often lost in Bucket No. 1.
A number of start-ups have been trying to solve this problem for some time, including Branch, which entices people to start a longer, more in-depth conversation about a specific topic and invite others to join the discussion.
Now Disqus, a comments platform for bloggers, is trying to help people find unique conversations using a data visualization, Disqus Gravity.
In a post on the company’s Web site, the new feature is described as a “live feed of trending discussions happening across the galaxy of sites that use Disqus.†There are 700 million people who engage with the service a month.
The data visualization looks like a bunch of marbles floating around on a shiny floor, with round circles shimmering about, each belonging to a genre of commentary: sports, news, celebrity gossip. The larger the circle, the more people involved in a conversation about the topic. Comments that have seen the most interaction by readers are highlighted, and stand out from the rest of the chatter.
That is, providing people want to read the comments in the first place.
On Tuesday, Jawbone, which makes wireless headsets and music accessories, announced that it acquired BodyMedia, a company that sells wearable sensors, for about $110 million.
Jawbone declined to comment on how much it paid for the acquisition, but a source close to the deal who was not authorized to speak on the record confirmed the price.
“It’s a significant deal because it’s a significant opportunity,†said Hosain Rahman, the chief executive of Jawbone. “We looked at the market and what we thought about what we can do on our own or together with BodyMedia, and we found a deal acceptable to our shareholders.â€
BodyMedia has been making and selling activity tracking armbands that can monitor exercise and sleep behaviors since 1999. Mr. Rahman said he was most interested in the company’s expertise, and its robust trove of data about how people use and interact with their body monitors and sensors. His plan is to continue to run and sell BodyMedia products and incorporate Jawbone’s line of wearable products into BodyMedia’s software services that let people view and monitor their activity.
In addition, Mr. Rahman said he was interested in BodyMedia’s portfolio of patents, which he thinks will help future-proof the company as more companies get into developing and marketing their own wearable designs.
“When you are a creator or inventor, you have to make sure you are protected and make sure your innovation is solid and protected,†he said.
Currently, Jawbone sells the Up, a wearable fitness bracelet, but the device has had some stumbles in the market, making its debut to some unfavorable reviews and critical reactions to the app that is meant to be used with the wristband.
But Mr. Rahman says the Up has been the company’s fastest-selling product, although he declined to share specifics on sales, further bolstering the company’s bet in the new hardware category.
“We now have the definitive intellectual property for the next phases of wearable tech,†he said.
On Tuesday, Jawbone, which makes wireless headsets and music accessories, announced that it acquired BodyMedia, a company that sells wearable sensors, for about $110 million.
Jawbone declined to comment on how much it paid for the acquisition, but a source close to the deal who was not authorized to speak on the record confirmed the price.
“It’s a significant deal because it’s a significant opportunity,†said Hosain Rahman, the chief executive of Jawbone. “We looked at the market and what we thought about what we can do on our own or together with BodyMedia, and we found a deal acceptable to our shareholders.â€
BodyMedia has been making and selling activity tracking armbands that can monitor exercise and sleep behaviors since 1999. Mr. Rahman said he was most interested in the company’s expertise, and its robust trove of data about how people use and interact with their body monitors and sensors. His plan is to continue to run and sell BodyMedia products and incorporate Jawbone’s line of wearable products into BodyMedia’s software services that let people view and monitor their activity.
In addition, Mr. Rahman said he was interested in BodyMedia’s portfolio of patents, which he thinks will help future-proof the company as more companies get into developing and marketing their own wearable designs.
“When you are a creator or inventor, you have to make sure you are protected and make sure your innovation is solid and protected,†he said.
Currently, Jawbone sells the Up, a wearable fitness bracelet, but the device has had some stumbles in the market, making its debut to some unfavorable reviews and critical reactions to the app that is meant to be used with the wristband.
But Mr. Rahman says the Up has been the company’s fastest-selling product, although he declined to share specifics on sales, further bolstering the company’s bet in the new hardware category.
“We now have the definitive intellectual property for the next phases of wearable tech,†he said.
On Tuesday, Jawbone, which makes wireless headsets and music accessories, announced that it acquired BodyMedia, a company that sells wearable sensors, for about $110 million.
Jawbone declined to comment on how much it paid for the acquisition, but a source close to the deal who was not authorized to speak on the record confirmed the price.
“It’s a significant deal because it’s a significant opportunity,†said Hosain Rahman, the chief executive of Jawbone. “We looked at the market and what we thought about what we can do on our own or together with BodyMedia, and we found a deal acceptable to our shareholders.â€
BodyMedia has been making and selling activity tracking armbands that can monitor exercise and sleep behaviors since 1999. Mr. Rahman said he was most interested in the company’s expertise, and its robust trove of data about how people use and interact with their body monitors and sensors. His plan is to continue to run and sell BodyMedia products and incorporate Jawbone’s line of wearable products into BodyMedia’s software services that let people view and monitor their activity.
In addition, Mr. Rahman said he was interested in BodyMedia’s portfolio of patents, which he thinks will help future-proof the company as more companies get into developing and marketing their own wearable designs.
“When you are a creator or inventor, you have to make sure you are protected and make sure your innovation is solid and protected,†he said.
Currently, Jawbone sells the Up, a wearable fitness bracelet, but the device has had some stumbles in the market, making its debut to some unfavorable reviews and critical reactions to the app that is meant to be used with the wristband.
But Mr. Rahman says the Up has been the company’s fastest-selling product, although he declined to share specifics on sales, further bolstering the company’s bet in the new hardware category.
“We now have the definitive intellectual property for the next phases of wearable tech,†he said.
