DXPG

Total Pageviews

Friday, July 26, 2013

Tahrir Taken, Some Egyptians Look for a ‘Third Square’ to Resist Islamists and Army

As hundreds of thousands of Egyptians crammed into dueling rallies in different parts of Cairo on Friday, responding to calls for support from rival political factions around the army and the Muslim Brotherhood, activists who mistrust both groups were left wondering how best to register their disgust with the military and the Islamists.

With Tahrir Square packed with flag-waving supporters of the defense minister, Gen. Abdul-Fattah el-Sisi, and the rally across town, outside the Rabaa al-Adawiya mosque, calling for the reinstatement of Mohamed Morsi, the deposed Islamist president, many dissenters avoided the streets and mocked both sides from afar online.

The activist filmmaker Aalam Wassef, who made subversive Web videos during the Mubarak era under the pseudonym Ahmad Sherif, released a bleakly comic music video, which showed him sitting out Friday’s demonstrations at home, doing his laundry in front of a banner with a single word on it: “Resist.”

“Resist,” a music video commentary on events in Egypt from Aalam Wassef, an activist filmmaker.

The song’s lyrics summed up the topsy-turvy sense of a world turned sideways and then upside down, scrambling the positions taken by three groups during Egypt’s 2011 revolution â€" the revolutionaries, the “felool,” or “remnants” of the Mubarak regime, and “the Couch Party,” made up of citizens who watch political disputes unfold on television. “Today the revolutionaries are members of the Couch Party,” Mr. Wassef’s collaborator Mariam K. sings, “The Brotherhood are felool and the felool are playing revolutionaries.” And that, Mr. Wassef chimes in, is “the surreal story of Egypt.”

Another dissident, Omar Robert Hamilton, a leader of the Mosireen media collective that grew out of an effort to document the 2011 revolution, wrote on Twitter that he visited Tahrir Square to collect five minutes of footage for the archive, but found “the blind uniformity of this nationalism,” extremely depressing.

Mr. Hamilton also drew attention to ironic contrasts he noticed on the streets on Friday, like Egyptian soldiers deployed next to a mural dedicated to the activist Mina Daniel, who was killed by troops during the notorious Maspero massacre of mainly Coptic Christian protesters in late 2011, when Egypt was under direct military rule.

Volunteers from Tahrir Bodyguard, a group set up to protect female protesters from sexual assault during demonstrations in the square, posted an alert on Twitter saying that they would not be present on Friday.

A small number of activists did take to the streets, however, displaying banners in Sphinx Square with red lines through the faces of both General Sisi and Mr. Morsi.

As the Egyptian-British blogger Sarah Carr reported for Mada Masr, an English language news site, the dozens of protesters in Sphinx Square, “refer to their movement as “The Third Square.”

In a leaflet distributed in the protest they describe themselves as “a group of Egyptians who protested on January 25 against the corruption of the Mubarak state… protested against [former head of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces Field Marshal Hussein] Tantawi’s men, who gave the army a bad name during the transitional period, and protested against Morsi and religious fascism in order to call for early elections.”

The leaflet says that they are protesting today against the army playing a role in politics and against “the defense minister calling for an authorization to kill Egyptians on the pretext of fighting terrorism when fighting terrorism does not require a mandate because that is the duty of the Armed Forces.”

One protester, Marwa Ibrahim, told Ms. Carr: “I refused the June 30 coup not because I loved Morsi but because it was a violation of revolutionary legitimacy. We want a civilian president.” She added that her main priority was getting justice for all of the protesters killed since Jan. 25, 2011.

Other bloggers and journalists who were in Tahrir Square for the uprising that drove the former air force commander, Hosni Mubarak, from office, registered their dissent or noted with amazement the scenes of pro-military fervor on the streets of Cairo on Friday.

Others drew attention to the paradoxical fact that the American-financed Egyptian military seemed to be drumming up support by casting itself as a bulwark of defense against the United States. Some posters drew on the widely embraced conspiracy theory that the Brotherhood was secretly supported by the Obama administration.

As the political commentator Bassem Sabry noted, some well-printed banners displayed on Friday even referred to American government’s decision this week to hold back delivery of new fighter jets to Egypt after the defense minister called for a popular mandate to “fight terrorism.”

Outside the main train station on Friday morning in the city of Alexandria â€" where there were violent clashes between supporters and opponents of the deposed president later in the day â€" supporters of the military underscored their hatred of the United States by hanging a huge poster of Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, alongside one of General Sisi. The words above Mr. Putin’s image read: “Bye, Bye, America.”



Pinterest Allows Users to Opt-Out of Being Tracked

In Silicon Valley there are hundreds of companies that track people’s habits with the hopes of offering more intrusive advertising. There are, in comparison, very few Valley start-ups that give people the opportunity to opt out of that tracking.

On Friday, Pinterest, which allows users to share photographs and other media on custom “pinboards,” joined the short list of companies that do give people that option.

Pinterest is doing this by enabling the Do Not Track feature in certain Web browsers that allows people to avoid cookies that collect personal information as well as any third-party cookies, including those used for advertising.

In May 2012 Twitter began offering this feature to people who use the social network. But the Do Not Track functionality will work only if a Web site agrees to acknowledge it.

As for people who do not select the Do Not Track feature, Pinterest will be watching over their shoulders more than it has in the past. As Twitter did in 2012, Pinterest introduced a new feature that it says will help surface better content to users.

At the same time it announced the Do Not Track option, the company added a new “board suggestions” component to its site. It will figure out the right type of recommendations for content by tracking the type of Web sites someone has visited that included a “Pin” button.

For example, if you visit a cooking Web site that displays the Pinterest Pin, and then go to Pinterest’s Web site, you will see recommendations for cooking-related pinboards.

In a blog post on the company’s Web site, Pinterest said: “We’re excited to offer everyone a more personal experience, but we also understand if you’re not interested. We respect Do Not Track as an option for people who want to turn off this collection of browsing activity from other sites.”

Privacy groups lauded the company’s decision to allow people to avoid being tracked online.

“It’s good to see some prominent companies come forward and adopt these standards,” said Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit privacy group, in a phone interview. “By doing so they are saying ‘we’re going to respect people’s privacy preferences.’”

Joseph Lorenzo Hall, a senior staff technologist with the Center for Democracy & Technology, a nonprofit policy group in Washington, said it is important for more companies to follow suit and provide people with the ability to avoid being tracked across the Web.

“Including Twitter, Pinterest is another major first party that has decided to listen to desires of users and offer them this choice,” Mr. Hall said. He noted that the effort behind Do Not Track remains the same: “Provide users simple and usable ways to signal that they don’t want opaque third-parties creating profiles of their online behavior.”

The Do Not Track initiative has recently been embroiled in its own spat of controversy as advertisers feel threatened by the technology. But that hasn’t stopped Pinterest from giving people an option.

“While consensus around the technical specs remains elusive, people are making a choice when they turn on Do Not Track,” said Mike Yang, general counsel of Pinterest, in an e-mail. “We’re going to respect that choice.”



Daily Report: Proposing a ‘Nutrition Label’ for Mobile Apps

Like food packages that display nutrition labels, some mobile apps could soon display information that allows consumers to decide at a glance whether the apps are good for them, Natasha Singer reports.

A variety of groups, including app developers and consumer advocates, have agreed to test a voluntary code of conduct that would require participating app developers to offer short-form notices about whether their apps collect certain personal details from users â€" including health and social networking data â€" or share user-specific data with entities like advertising networks or consumer data resellers.

The idea is to allow people to compare the data collection practices of, say, flashlight apps and choose one that does not ingest unrelated material like their photos or contact lists. The determination that the notices are ready for testing is the outcome of yearlong negotiations â€" convened by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, a division of the United States Commerce Department â€" to increase mobile app transparency for consumers. Participants included app developers, digital marketing, civil liberties, consumer and privacy groups.

On Thursday, many participants in the process voted to support a version of the code drafted by a diverse coalition including the Application Developers Alliance, an industry association, and advocacy groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and the World Privacy Forum.

Although major mobile app developers like Apple and Google, which develops mobile apps for its Android platform, have not indicated whether they intend to sign on to the code of conduct, groups involved in drafting it say it is a significant advance in mobile privacy for consumers â€" and an unusual agreement among industry and consumer advocates.

“It’s a victory for common sense,” said Tim Sparapani, vice president for law, policy and government relations at the Application Developers Alliance, a group representing more than 100 companies and 20,000 individual developers.



Daily Report: Proposing a ‘Nutrition Label’ for Mobile Apps

Like food packages that display nutrition labels, some mobile apps could soon display information that allows consumers to decide at a glance whether the apps are good for them, Natasha Singer reports.

A variety of groups, including app developers and consumer advocates, have agreed to test a voluntary code of conduct that would require participating app developers to offer short-form notices about whether their apps collect certain personal details from users â€" including health and social networking data â€" or share user-specific data with entities like advertising networks or consumer data resellers.

The idea is to allow people to compare the data collection practices of, say, flashlight apps and choose one that does not ingest unrelated material like their photos or contact lists. The determination that the notices are ready for testing is the outcome of yearlong negotiations â€" convened by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, a division of the United States Commerce Department â€" to increase mobile app transparency for consumers. Participants included app developers, digital marketing, civil liberties, consumer and privacy groups.

On Thursday, many participants in the process voted to support a version of the code drafted by a diverse coalition including the Application Developers Alliance, an industry association, and advocacy groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and the World Privacy Forum.

Although major mobile app developers like Apple and Google, which develops mobile apps for its Android platform, have not indicated whether they intend to sign on to the code of conduct, groups involved in drafting it say it is a significant advance in mobile privacy for consumers â€" and an unusual agreement among industry and consumer advocates.

“It’s a victory for common sense,” said Tim Sparapani, vice president for law, policy and government relations at the Application Developers Alliance, a group representing more than 100 companies and 20,000 individual developers.