As my colleagues Isabel Kershner and Fares Akram report, the tension of daily life in the occupied West Bank exploded into deadly violence on Tuesday, when a knife-wielding Palestinian man attacked and killed an Israeli settler at a bus stop. The attacker, identified as Salam Zaghal, a 24-year-old who recently spent three years in jail for throwing stones, then seized the dead manâs pistol and engaged in a shoot-out with police officers.
Before the victim, Evyatar Borovsky, a 31-year-old father of five, was laid to rest in an emotional ceremony, vigilantes from the Israeli settlements that dot the West Bank sought to punish their Palestinian neighbors by smashing the windows of a mosque, setting fields on fire and throwing stones at a school bus.
On social networks and in statements to the news media, representatives Israelâs military and the leadership of the settler community were in no doubt about the nature of the attack, describing the killing as the murder of an Israeli civilian by a Palestinian terrorist.
Some supporters of the national-religious settlement project, like the editors of The Jewish Press in Brooklyn, even blamed the officers who responded to the attack for not just killing the attacker on the spot. âIt is not clear,â The Press reported, âwhy they shot the terrorist in the leg, and not the head.â
From Palestinians and Israelis who oppose the occupation, though, condemnations of the killing were mixed with calls to pay attention to the broader context â" in which an Arab community of 2.5 million, living under military rule for 46 years, is forced to accommodate itself to an influx of hundreds of thousands of Israeli migrants to expanding Jewish-only settlements, defended by armed soldiers, officers and civilian guards.
In a statement offering âcondolences to the family of the murder victim,â the Israeli group Rabbis for Human Rights said it was âhorrified by the nationalistic murder,â but also suggested that Palestinians are engaged in âa morally justified campaign against a discriminatory military regime.â The rabbis quickly added, however, that even a just cause âdoes not justify harm to civilians, and we harshly condemn any attack such as this.â
According to Yousef Munayyer, the director of The Palestine Center in Washington, his group has documented more than 1,200 incidents of violence by settlers in the 18 months since the last killing of an Israeli civilian in the occupied territory.
In a post for the Israeli news blog +972, Mairav Zonszein, argued that the 18 months since the last fatal attack on an Israeli in the West Bank had created âan illusion of calm and stabilityâ in a status quo that is unsustainable. Ms. Zonszein, an Israeli-American blogger who works with Taâayush, an Arab-Jewish group that supports rural Palestinian communities in the South Hebron Hills, wrote:
During this âcalmâ period, most Israelis continue going about their lives. They arenât affected by the violence of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on a daily basis. But days like today, when the phrase âterror attackâ is back in the news, Israelis suddenly remember that we are in a violent conflict. The government, of course, does a good job of reminding us we are the victims.
But on all those days when there is no violence against Israelis in the news, on all those days when Israelis can go about their business, the situation is actually not at all stable or calm. Itâs definitely not calm for the Palestinian population, specifically in the West Bank where life under occupation is anything but free of violence.
By way of explanation, Ms. Zonszein cited remarks published last year by the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek, on the constant pressure of life in the West Bank, between outbreaks of deadly violence, in which he asked the rhetorical question: âWhat goes on in the Middle East when nothing goes on there at the direct politico-military level (i.e. when there are no tensions, attacks, negotiations)?â His answer was:
What goes on is the incessant slow work of taking the land from the Palestinians in the West Bank: the gradual strangling of the Palestinian economy, the parceling of their land, the building of new settlements, the pressure on Palestinian farmers to make them abandon their land (which goes from crop-burning and religious desecration up to individual killings), all this supported by a Kafkaesque network of legal regulations.
âTo avoid any kind of misunderstanding,â Mr. Žižek added, âtaking all this into account in no way implies any âunderstandingâ for inexcusable terrorist acts. On the contrary, it provides the only ground from which one can condemn the terrorist attacks without hypocrisy.â
In the days before the deadly attack, Ms. Zonszeinâs fellow-activists at Taâayush were working to draw attention to how very tense daily life in the occupied West Bank can be when Israeli soldiers try to keep Palestinian farmers away from land near Israeli settlements.
Over the weekend, Taâayush released a brief video clip showing an Israeli soldier shouting with rage at Israeli activists who had accompanied Palestinian shepherds from a West Bank village as they tried to graze their sheep on land near Othniâel, an Israeli settlement.
According to Ms. Zonszeinâs translation, when a Taâayush activist named Guy interrupted the soldier as he was shouting at a shepherd, the reservist turned to Guyâs camera and screamed âGet out of here you Israel haters!â After threatening to hit the activist, he added: âYou are worse than the Arabs!â The officer then shouted at a female Israeli activist: âShut up, Israel hater who goes to bed with Arabs!â
After the video was featured on the Web site of Israelâs most popular newspaper, Yedioth Ahronoth, the Israeli military called the officerâs conduct unbecoming, but suggested that the confrontation had been provoked by the âleft-wing activistsâ who recorded it.
Activists from Taâayush have also documented an apparent effort by Israeli officers in the West Bank to prevent footage of what ordinary aspects of the occupation look like from being recorded. In another video clip, released with a blog post on Saturday, soldiers can be seen repeatedly blocking the lens of Taâayush activists as they attempted to film the shepherds being forced away from land near the settlement.
Asked about this footage, in which officers can be seen using their own phones and cameras to block the lenses of the activists, a spokesman for the Israel Defense Forces, Capt. Eytan Buchman, told The Lede: âa Palestinian shepherd, accompanied by Israeli activists, tried to illegally graze a field adjacent to the town of Othniâel in a blatant attempt to create a provocation. Security forces arrived in order to distance the shepherd and activists without the use of force.â
Amiel Vardi, a Hebrew University classics professor and one of the founders of Taâayush, was with the shepherds in South Mount Hebron when the video was recorded. He told The Lede in an e-mail, âthe soldiers gave no reason,â for blocking their cameras. âOn the contrary, they insisted that they do not restrict our filming â" only filming us too, as is their right. So much for what they said. As for what they actually did, I suppose they know that they have no legal authority to drive the shepherds away from these lands, and are not to keen to be filmed doing it.â
As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported, Mr. Vardi âwas shot in 2006 by a settler when he and friends tried to help Palestinian farmers reach their vineyards during the grape harvest.â
According to the Taâayush activists, the effort to prevent them from recording scenes of routine confrontations in the occupied West Bank is a concerted one. Last month, they posted a video compilation of officers blocking their cameras during several visits to the area, and at the start of this month, they were even detained for several hours by police officers investigating a complaint filed by settlers who accused the activists of âdisturbing public orderâ by filming construction at a settlement.